Hello #TruthSeekers !

Let’s get straight into it. Some of you very well know my stance on 911. If you don’t I encourage you to read the following blog:

CLICK HERE – 15 Year Anniversary of 911 Inside Job!

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 01: President Barack Obama speaks at a press conference on October 1, 2015 in Washington, DC. According to reports, 10 were killed and 20 injured when a gunman opened fire at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)I am sure you have your own questions about these terrorist attacks, because in reality the answers we’ve been given by the American Government and their experts seem to be a cop out and a major cover up.

And what is fueling the 911 fire in the States at the moment is President Barack Obama just on Friday, vetoed* controversial legislation aimed at helping the families of the victims of the September 11 attacks SUE Saudi Arabia!

The measure, which was unanimously passed by both the House and Senate, would have enabled the families of victims of the 911 terror attacks to sue Saudi Arabia IF that country was found legally liable for helping support the deadliest terrorist acts on U.S. soil.

And as the reports goes, 15 of the 19 ‘supposed’ terrorists were Saudi, yet that Nation’s leaders have previously opposed the legislation AND denied involvement.

Now we are being told my mainstream media that THE WHITE HOUSE is strongly opposed to the “Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act” legislation, out of concerns it will open the floodgates and leave the U.S. vulnerable and exposed to similar law suits.

Well, that could be one reason why the US Government would not want to support such a legislation, as they have repeatedly conducted acts of genocide around the planet for many decades, in order to gain power, oil, natural resources and appease their ‘elite family leaders’.  I could see how that may be worrying for them, because practically every country on the planet could at some point sue the American Government for an act of terrorism* – whether they were directly or indirectly targeted.

Yet I believe something else is going on here. Now let me share something with you. Here is a statement from the US President himself explaining the veto on Friday. He said he had .. “deep sympathy for the families of the victims of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 (9/11), who have suffered grievously. I also have a deep appreciation of these families’ desire to pursue justice and am strongly committed to assisting them in their efforts.”

However, the measure would .. “invite consequential decisions to be made based upon incomplete information and risk having different courts reaching different conclusions about the culpability of individual foreign governments and their role in terrorist activities directed against the United States — which is neither an effective nor a coordinated way for us to respond to indications that a foreign government might have been behind a terrorist attack,”

9-11commissionHmmmm .. let me go over that last part again! And I want to focus on the words ‘incomplete information’!!!! WTF, was there not a 9/11 Commission Report that took years to put together & costs millions of $$s, which supposedly offered EXPERT INFORMATION about the September 11 Terrorist Attacks? Is President Obama confessing that this is INCOMPLETE INFORMATION in his speech, and if so, could it be because the whole report is one BIG FAT LIE?

What also made my TruthSeeker-Spidey senses go off was when I read this in one of the mainstream reports:

“White House press secretary Josh Earnest earlier this week said the president and members of his national security team have had ongoing conversations with members of Congress about the legislation and expressed their concerns. The White House worries that the nation’s diplomats and even business leaders could be put at risk by such legislation.”

Ummmm .. let me go over this again! Just in case you missed it ..

The White House worries that the nation’s diplomats and even business leaders could be put at risk by such legislation!

Now let me get this right!!! The White House is worried for ‘Business Leaders’ security if they pass a legislation that would simply give the 911 victims’ families some justice? If the ‘Business Leaders’ were to be put at risk, maybe what The White House is actually saying is ‘Corporate America will risk being outed for their involvement in 911’?

Because truth is #truthseekers, when you follow the insane infatuation with money, you follow the endless lies & corruption, that lead you to these corrupt psychopathic decision makers .. which is where and why these evil things happen.

vote-for-me-puppetsI am not saying every corporation is corrupt, nor am I saying every single politician is there for their own egotistical fulfillment, however there are a lot of cover ups and conspiracy immersed in some of these huge companies that feed Government pockets. This is why an oil company can spill millions of tonnes of oil in the ocean, killing millions of wildlife and endangering the lives of humans, and nothing really gets done and no-one goes to jail. However if I had a serious illness and I was to grow pot to make medicinal cannabis oil to heal that disease, I’d go to fucking jail!!! Do you see the gross inconsistency in what happens at the top????

The thing is, after you spend years researching ‘the lies’ in a quest to ‘find the truth’, you will discover a lot of the decisions that have been made in The White House & Parliament Houses all around the world, is a joint effort with politicians, business leaders and the elite establishment, in order to serve a few at the top, rather than the mass of us on the planet.

Question Everything!

Greg Riley


#TruthSeeker #GregRiley #QuestionEverything

*VETO: ‘a constitutional right to reject a decision or proposal made by a lawmaking body’

*TERRORISM: ‘the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims’